<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Should A Test Plan Contain?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.developsense.com/blog/2008/12/what-should-test-plan-contain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.developsense.com/blog/2008/12/what-should-test-plan-contain/</link>
	<description>DevelopSense Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:56:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.developsense.com/blog/2008/12/what-should-test-plan-contain/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 03:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developsense.com/wordpress/?p=109#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Mike - Thanks for the helpful post, some quick points I take away:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1. Reminding the team to stop and think about planning in a structured way, versus banging out the default document set. Eisenhower had a good quote: &quot;Plans are nothing; planning is everything.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2. Cem&#039;s question of: is the plan a tool versus a product has to be answered early in the project. That answer will set the context for prioritizing the qualities of the project&#039;s technical documentation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;3. Planning works best if the whole technical team engages in the conversation. My technical black-holes as the test lead are sometimes solved easily by developers. And vice versa. Somethings we all need to recalibrate on the goals and priorities.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;4. Many testers claim to use the heuristics you&#039;ve listed. But do they have an organized method (that they can easily explain) to apply the heuristics? There is value in having a method, practicing it, and consistently applying it - increases testing skill level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; Thanks for the helpful post, some quick points I take away:</p>
<p>1. Reminding the team to stop and think about planning in a structured way, versus banging out the default document set. Eisenhower had a good quote: &#8220;Plans are nothing; planning is everything.&#8221;</p>
<p>2. Cem&#8217;s question of: is the plan a tool versus a product has to be answered early in the project. That answer will set the context for prioritizing the qualities of the project&#8217;s technical documentation.</p>
<p>3. Planning works best if the whole technical team engages in the conversation. My technical black-holes as the test lead are sometimes solved easily by developers. And vice versa. Somethings we all need to recalibrate on the goals and priorities.</p>
<p>4. Many testers claim to use the heuristics you&#8217;ve listed. But do they have an organized method (that they can easily explain) to apply the heuristics? There is value in having a method, practicing it, and consistently applying it &#8211; increases testing skill level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Gaertner</title>
		<link>http://www.developsense.com/blog/2008/12/what-should-test-plan-contain/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Gaertner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developsense.com/wordpress/?p=109#comment-171</guid>
		<description>The thoughts on the planning document reminded me to delaying decisions until the least responsible moment - as stated by Agilists. Very well I see parallels between the context-driven way you described and the agile one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thoughts on the planning document reminded me to delaying decisions until the least responsible moment &#8211; as stated by Agilists. Very well I see parallels between the context-driven way you described and the agile one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

